Wednesday, July 24, 2019
The Church's View on Contraception Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words
The Church's View on Contraception - Essay Example Based on the Scriptures, particularly in the Book of Genesis 38:8-10, the act of Onan spilling his seed ââ¬â which is an equivalent of coitus interruptus ââ¬â was condemned by God and the Jewish law. Based on the ancient Jewish law of fathering children, it was a duty of the brother to perform to his sister-in-law the role of husband if his brother dies. However, Onan changed his mind about fathering a child which was supposed to be his brotherââ¬â¢s and thus ââ¬Å"spilled the semen on the groundâ⬠¦And what he did was displeasing in the sight of the Lord, and he slew him alsoâ⬠(Brom; Gen. 38:9-10). In Deuteronomy 25:7-10, it is stated that the man who does not give children to his sister-in-law in case his brother dies would naturally get punished with public humiliation. However, since God slew Onan, then the spilling of oneââ¬â¢s semen ââ¬â or more loosely, the concept of contraception ââ¬â is obviously a more serious moral offense that simply not g iving oneââ¬â¢s brotherââ¬â¢s widow a child. Other books of the Bible also condemn contraception. In the New Testament, Paulââ¬â¢s Epistle to the Romans states, ââ¬Å"God has given them over to shameful passions. ... These writings were after all based on the principles of the Bible and the natural law. Onanism, or the act of Onan spilling his semen, was echoed by several church fathers during the early years of the Church. One of the most prominent Church Fathers who condemned contraception in this way was Clement of Alexandria, who, in 195 AD, wrote in The Instructor of Children 2:10:91:2, ââ¬Å"Because of its divine institution for the propagation of man, the seed is not to be vainly ejaculated, nor is it to be damaged, nor is it to be wastedâ⬠(Brom). Although the aforementioned statement of Clement of Alexandria somehow includes even acts like masturbation, it is still clear that the Church condemns contraception in whatever form that it can be carried out. The Protestant Reformer Martin Luther also expressed condemnation against onanism and referred to it as ââ¬Å"the exceedingly foul deed of Onanâ⬠and that Onan ââ¬Å"deserved to be killed by Godâ⬠(Brom). Luther, therefo re, emphasizes, through Onanââ¬â¢s example, that the sinner deserves Godââ¬â¢s punishment. John Calvin of the Calvinist Church echoed Lutherââ¬â¢s condemnation by saying that the intentional spilling of semen is ââ¬Å"a monstrous thingâ⬠(Brom). Moreover, John Wesley, founder of the Methodist Church, stated that onanism was ââ¬Å"very displeasing to Godâ⬠and was tantamount to the destruction of the soul (Brom). Contraceptives and methods to tighten the reproductive system have also long been condemned by the ancient Christian Church. Another Church Father in the name of Hippolytus of Rome indicated in his Refutation of All Heresies 9:12, in 255 AD, that ââ¬Å"the so-called faithful [should not] use drugs of sterility or bid themselves tightly in order to expel a fetus which
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.